Snooker boss responds to ‘poor scheduling’ criticism and says more events could leave the UK.

Snooker boss responds to ‘poor scheduling’ criticism and says more events could leave the UK.

 

 

The head of professional snooker has pushed back against criticism over “poor scheduling” on the sport’s calendar, warning that more tournaments could be staged outside the UK if the game is to continue growing globally.

Responding to complaints from players and fans about long sessions, late finishes and congested event timetables, the snooker boss defended recent scheduling decisions as a necessary consequence of an expanding tour. He argued that the sport is facing increasing pressure to balance its traditional British base with rising international demand.

In recent weeks, several high-profile players have voiced frustration at matches finishing in the early hours of the morning, particularly during multi-table events and major tournaments. Critics say such scheduling is damaging to player welfare, competitive fairness and the viewing experience for fans watching at home or attending venues.

However, the sport’s chief executive insisted that organisers are working within tight constraints. He explained that broadcasters, venue availability and commercial commitments all play a significant role in shaping match schedules, leaving limited room for manoeuvre.

“People see the end result but not the complexity behind it,” he said. “We’re trying to deliver the best possible product for fans, players and partners at the same time. It’s not as simple as just starting matches earlier or reducing sessions.”

He also stressed that snooker is no longer a UK-only sport and warned that an inward-looking approach could have consequences. According to the governing body, overseas markets are showing increasing interest in hosting ranking events, often backed by significant investment.

“If we don’t embrace the global nature of the tour, those opportunities won’t wait,” he said. “There are countries prepared to put on world-class events, offer excellent facilities and reach new audiences. If the UK can’t accommodate growth, then naturally some events will move elsewhere.”

The comments are likely to concern traditionalists, with the UK having hosted the majority of snooker’s biggest tournaments for decades. Events such as the World Championship, UK Championship and Masters remain central to the calendar, but the number of international ranking events has increased steadily in recent years.

Player reaction has been mixed. While some have acknowledged the financial benefits of expansion, others remain uneasy about travel demands and scheduling intensity. Several have called for clearer communication and greater consultation when calendars are finalised.

The snooker boss said player feedback is being taken seriously and hinted that future adjustments could be made, including trialling revised session times or streamlined formats at selected events. He added, however, that compromise is unavoidable in a sport operating across multiple time zones and markets.

“Growth brings challenges, but it also brings opportunity,” he said. “Our job is to manage that responsibly without losing what makes snooker special.”

As the debate continues, the balance between tradition and expansion is set to remain a defining issue for the sport’s future.